"Long Engine Life Starts With Reiff"

Main Page  |  Place an Order  | Contact Us  |  FAQ

Reiff vs. The Other Brand

Comparison of Prices

Comparison of Performance

Aviation Consumer Reviews

Comparison of Prices *

* Source of competitor data is their web site as of 3/5/2010.  Engine heater prices are per engine and include standard wattage cylinder and oil heaters. We compare their "Standard" and "Premium" systems to our Standard systems only, because their web site does not show any high wattage systems comparable to our Turbo and Turbo XP Systems.  Note competitor's "Premium System" is the same wattage as their "Standard System".  Their Standard System will not work with an engine analyzer because the cylinder heater elements screw into the threaded holes intended for the CHT sensors.  The Premium system replaces each of those elements with a "bolt heater" that replaces one of the intake manifold bolts on each cylinder.  Our system does not conflict with CHT sensors.

A big advantage of our system is that it is non-invasive.  All our parts are installed "on" the engine.  Nothing is installed inside the engine, and you do not need to remove any Lycoming or Continental OEM parts or replace any OEM parts with our parts.  For example, our primary competitor's system replaces the OEM intake manifold bolts with their own heated bolts.  These are simply hollowed out bolts with heating elements epoxied into the hollowed out core.  As a general design philosophy we feel it is safer not to replace parts that were installed by the engine manufacturer, especially critical structural parts like bolts.

Comparison of Performance

Test Method

The tests were conducted on our Cherokee 235 with a Lycoming 0-540 engine, which is equipped with both our competitor's system and ours.  In each test the aircraft was in our unheated hanger, the air inlets were plugged with foam rubber cowl plugs, the cowling was covered with a blanket which laid over the top and hung about halfway down the sides , and the sump had 9 qts of oil. The temperatures were obtained by a calibrated digital thermometer with a remote probe inserted between the top two fins on the center left cylinder, and a second probe dropped down the oil filler tube with the tip suspended at the 4.5 qt level.  The other brand's system includes a 50 w probe on 5 of 6 cylinder heads (a CHT is on the other) and two 50 w elements on the oil sump.  For the test of the competitor's system we measured one of the heated cylinders - not the unheated one.  Ambient temperature was about 20^o F.

 

Test Results

A comment about the other brand's test results:

Our competitor has a graph which shows their system outperforming ours, however, their testing method gives a skewed result.  They measured the temperature with a spark plug thermocouple only about one inch from their heating element in the CHT port, several inches away from our heating element.  When we did our comparison tests we wanted them to be fair, credible, and able to withstand independent scrutiny, so we measured at the top end of the cylinder, about midway between our heating element and theirs.

Also note that their test was done without a cover, despite the fact their instructions are to "Always use an insulated cover". A cover holds the heat inside the cowling and helps make the temperatures in the engine compartment uniform regardless of the placement of the heat sources. Leaving the cover off makes the heating less uniform and the heat is more concentrated near the heat sources, so measuring the temp near their element and far from ours further skews the test result in their favor.

Finally, note that the only temperature they compare in their test is the cylinder head. They do not measure the oil.

Heating performance is a function of wattage.  Period.  Our watts are not better than anyone else's, nor are theirs better than ours.

We recognize that any product test performed by the product's producer (including ours) will be viewed with skepticism by the marketplace. From the perspective of the consumer, the most meaningful test is one performed by an unbiased third party such as Aviation Consumer. That's why we are providing the results of their tests below:

 

Aviation Consumer Reviews

Aviation Consumer will not give us permission to post their articles, but you can buy re-prints on their web site.  Here are summary quotes:

"Electric Preheaters: Reiff Enjoys Value Edge", March 2007

"In the teeth of an ice storm, we compare the top contenders...the field is dominated by two major companies - Reiff Preheat Systems and [other brand]"

"We think Reiff's Standard System is the best value choice for most owners... with [other brand] you'll pay about 30% more" [actually 47% more on average, see the price comparison table above].

"The Reiff Turbo XP showed the best performance"

"Reiff's HotBands are high-quality...they're easy to set up, so easy in fact that both owners and cavemen could do it...they required about six minutes each to install."

Regarding competitors selling only sump heaters..."In crazy cold weather we don't think it will be adequate.  If you want to plug in and fly as soon as possible, you'll need to add cylinder heaters."

"Pad, Plug, or Flamethrower?", March 2001, and 2002 Buying Guide

"When combined with the sump heater the [Reiff] HotBands delivered impressive performance.  At 6 hours the oil was 113^o and the cylinder, case, and nosepiece between 70 and 80^o...the engine smelled and felt warm to the touch.  In fact, we used the hot start procedure to fire it up and noted that the oil temperature was immediately off the lower peg.  With this kind of performance, we estimate the HotBand & sump pad combination is suitable for temperatures well below zero - say minus 20, or even colder with an insulated cover."

"[Other brand] loses us in claiming that the top of the cylinder is more critical to heat than the rest of the cylinder."

"As for heating the top of the cylinder being better, we just don't buy that."

"As for [Reiff cylinder] bands versus [other brand's] cylinder head plugs, our view is that [other brand] overstates the case in saying it's best to heat the head."

"Hot Ideas", February 1997

"With both the Reiff cylinder heaters and the oil sump pad plugged in, we parked our Mooney [4 cylinder Lyc. IO-360] on the ramp on a blustery 25^o night with no cover. After some 10 hours, we were somewhat surprised to find heat shimmering off the cowl, with the cylinders, crankcase, and accessory case toasty warm with temps between 65^o and 77^o, or 40 to 52^o above ambient, this after a night spent in sub-freezing winds. The nose section of the crankcase was at 75^o, the oil temperature at 99^o [74^o above ambient]. The engine started easily and showed above minimum oil and cylinder head temps soon after starting."

"We were impressed with the performance of Reiff's HotBand system when combined with a sump heater. When operated overnight on a cold, windy ramp with no cover, this system had our four cylinder Lycoming uniformly warm to the touch. This system is an excellent value and is suitable for very cold conditions."

Main Page  |  Place an Order  | Contact Us  |  FAQ

Last updated 3/8/10